When a doctor discusses medication choices and their side effects, what ethical principle are they adhering to?

The ethical principle being adhered to when a doctor discusses medication choices and their side effects is autonomy. This principle emphasizes the importance of respecting a patient's right to make informed decisions about their own healthcare. By engaging in a discussion about different medication options, along with their potential side effects, the doctor empowers the patient with the necessary information to weigh the risks and benefits effectively, thereby supporting their ability to make choices aligned with their values and preferences.

In this context, autonomy is crucial because it allows patients to take an active role in their treatment. They can express their preferences and make choices based on their individual circumstances, leading to more personalized and accepted medical care. The doctor's role is to provide clarity and guidance, ensuring that patients understand the implications of their choices.

While other ethical principles like beneficence (acting in the patient’s best interest) and non-maleficence (avoiding harm) play significant roles in medical practice, the specific act of discussing options and fostering informed decision-making directly reflects the principle of autonomy. Justice pertains more to fairness in resource allocation and access to care, which is not the focus in this scenario.